Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro 1:1 Lens for Nikon

Product Information

The Canon, even though it has a slightly shorter focal length, has a longer working distance (6"/150mm) than the Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Lens (4.8"/122mm). Some CA is visible in the corners at f/2.8, but this clears up when stopped down a couple of stops. I also have to give a lot of credit to the Laowa 100mm f/2.8. It has a unique optical design that goes to 2× magnification rather than 1×, yet it still manages to be either the sharpest or second-sharpest lens of these six. Bravo to Venus Optics (the company behind Laowa) for however they managed to achieve that. Bokeh and Out-of-Focus Color Fringing Nikon D600 | Tamron AP AF 90mm f/2.5 | 2.5 Nikon D600 | Tamron AP AF 90mm f/2.5 | 3.5 Nikon D7200 | Tamron AP AF 90mm f/2.5 | 5.6 Nikon D7200 | Tamron AP AF 90mm f/2.5 | 2.5 Specifications Use the limit position to reduce focus hunting time by limiting the focus distance to 12.3" - 14.7" (313mm - 370mm) or 14.75" - 8 (400mm - 8).

Last thing, due to its extending barrel (about 50% of its total length), hunting bugs/live small animals could be a problem. SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD (Model A011): update only via Tamron Service MF only, VC is not operational The score in the “features-department” is 2[-]/3[0]/8[+]. In direct comparison to the Nikon 105/2.8 the new Tamron 90/2.8 Macro VC ii looks pretty similar with the fluorine coating of the front lens making up for the missing lens case. Compared to its predecessor the lens features fluorine coating, improved image stabilization, weather sealing plus compatibility with the TAP-in console for fine-tuning but optical performance should be the same. So doubling the price of the lens seems like a bold move. With the Tamron SP 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO 1:1 VC USD (Model F017) wide open at f/2.8, you can see some noticeable light fall-off in the corners. Stopping down helps, although to completely get rid of this phenomenon, you will need to use an f-stop of f/5.6 or smaller.Overall, taking both center and corner sharpness into account, the Tamron 90mm VC f/2.8 is probably the sharpest of these six lenses at macro distances. A close second is the Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2×. The weakest is probably the Tokina, especially considering that it has the most vignetting and chromatic aberration of the lenses here. The Irix and Sigma also have some issues, although at least they’re good in terms of chromatic aberrations and vignetting. F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD (model B028): As of serial number 077981 or firmware 2.0, EOS R7 and R10 as of firmware 3.0 The other small thing is some chatter from the IS system. This is subjective (unless you to get a sound meter and test all lenses) but the IS system, when first activated with a half shutter or AF button press, makes something of a low, slightly grinding sounding noise. My Canon lenses make noises too, but this is just slightly louder and more gnarly sounding, if that makes sense. Again, not huge, but in my mind this kind of overshadows the USD feature. The Tamron SP 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO 1:1 VC USD (Model F017) features a USD (Ultrasonic Silent Drive) that allows near-silent auto-focusing. Importantly, this solution allows instant manual override even when the focus mode switch is in the AF position. Focusing is fully internal, meaning the length of the lens always remains constant. In use, we found the focusing to be indeed very quiet, and also fast with the lens mounted on a Canon EOS 5DS R body. Chromatic Aberrations

The Sigma 105 Macro is available in Canon (reviewed), Nikon, Sigma, Sony/Minolta, Pentax and Four-Thirds mounts. You can mount a 77mm filter such as a circular polarizer to the end of the filter where it is easy to reach.Although it has 8 aperture blades, bokeh (quality of OOF areas) is only OK (not as smooth as the Canon 100mm Macro for example). Center, maximum aperture, close focus: Tamron 90mm f/2.8 VC Laowa 100mm f/2.8 2× Tokina 100mm f/2.8 Nikon F 105mm f/2.8 VR Sigma 105mm f/2.8 OS Irix 150mm f/2.8 Personally, even though I own multiple macro lenses, I'm still on the fence about them. In some situations I adore their results, in other situations I find myself frustrated with them. More than anything, however, I think it is about finding out if a macro lens fits nicely into your workflow or not. Comes with no case but the lens hood is included and reversible for transport, the lens caps are are similar to Nikon’s pincer-type. Why Tamron decided to deliver a 800 EUR lens without a lens case is beyond me. [-] From Canon there is the EF 100mm 2.8 L Macro IS USM for 770 EUR. It’s from 2009 and of similar size and weight as the Tamron.

This lens has one downside, which applies on all lenses that does not have internal focusing, and that is that it becomes longer as you focus closer. No big deal IMO. Sigma offers three stabilized f2.8 macro lenses at 105mm (420 EUR), 150mm (900 EUR), and 180mm (1500 EUR). All three cover full-format sensors with the longer focal lengths offering longer working distances. And while the Sigma AF 105mm 2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro is only slightly larger and heavier than the Tamron, the Sigma AF 150mm 2.8 EX DG APO HSM OS Macro is already a 1.2kg lens and the 180mm sibling weighs in at 1.6kg. Note: The Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Lens has been replaced by the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Macro Lens. Focus breathing is when a lens's focal length seems to slightly change between max focus and minimum focus which effectively changes your frame without moving the camera. Almost all lenses suffer from this to a degree. Of all my lenses, my macro lenses suffer from this the most, presumably because of the extremely long focus distance. For example, my 150mm macro has a frame that is closer to a 135mm lens when focused at headshot range. Which I don't mind at all, personally, as I feel 135mm is the perfect portrait focal length for headshots but it is certainly a flaw worth noting Conclusion Second, there is the risk of a problem that results in the lens and body manufacturers pointing blame at each other.Unfortunately we will not be able to offer a firmware update for the following Tamron lenses (Canon mount) (Operation on EOS R/RP via the connection adapter is only possible in manual focus mode MF): SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 (Model A032): All serial numbers compatible, EOS R5 and R6 from firmware 2.0

Filter-thread: 62mm. Those filters are cheaper than the professional standard 77mm filters which are widely used. But chances are you may not have this size yet. Same with the Nikon 105/2.8. [0] From Sony mirrorless cameras, there’s the FE 90mm f2.8 Macro with optical stabilization for around 999 EUR which performed very well in Gordon’s tests with the A7r Mark II. No Tamron authorized service agent in Chicago, only one in California, it might charge three times more.Overall, Canon's USM AF is much nicer, but the Tamron performs better than the Sigma 105 in this regard. So, I was going in to battle with damaged morale, cumbersome equipment and a bit of apathy towards the entire scenario. SP 15-30mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 (Model A041): Serial number 004219 or higher or firmware 2.0 or higher For instance, the Nikon 55mm f/2.8 (both auto and manual focus versions) is arguably the sharpest lens in photography, but it's a poor choice serious macro use because it's too short and you have to get uncomfortably close.